M/S. I.T.I LTD. vs. The Assistant Commissioner (Assessment)

WP(C)/25471/2018HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01057058201827 July 2023Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH8 pages
For Petitioner: SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.), SRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN, SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court found that the recovery notices were issued contrary to the appellate authority's specific directions for a fresh assessment. Therefore, the Court set aside the impugned recovery notices and directed the assessing authority to pass a fresh assessment order after verifying the petitioner's books of accounts.

Facts

The petitioner challenged recovery notices for tax arrears from assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03. An appellate authority had previously directed the assessing authority to pass a fresh assessment order after verifying the petitioner's books of accounts, but the recovery notices were issued without complying with this direction.

Key Issues

Whether recovery notices issued without complying with an appellate authority's direction for a fresh assessment, based on a prior rectification order, are legally valid.

Sections Cited

Section 17(6) of Kerala GST Act, 1973

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 5TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 25471 OF 2018 PETITIONER: M/S. I.T.I LTD., KANJIKODE WEST, PALAKAKD, REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCE-IN-CHARGE, SHRI.SIVANANDAN.M. BY ADVS. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT) SPECIAL CIRCLE, COMMERCIAL TAXES,PALAKKAD-678 001. 2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONERAPPEALS-I COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM ON DEPUTATION TO ERNAKULAM PIN-686 001. 3 THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD-678 001. BY ADV GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESHMITA RAMACHANDRAN(GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC No.25471 of 2018 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 27th day of July, 2023

1.

Heard Smt.Nisha John, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms.Reshmitha Ramachandran, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2.

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for setting as

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.