M/S. Isha Holidays (P) LTD. vs. The Commissioner

WP(C)/30666/2023HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01067776202325 September 2023Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. V. C. CHARLYFor Respondent: SMT. RESHMITA RAMACHANDRAN – GP
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The High Court held that the appellate authority lacks the power to condone delay in filing an appeal beyond the statutory period of three months plus an additional one month. Therefore, the High Court found no grounds to interfere with the appellate authority's decision.

Facts

The petitioner challenged an assessment order under Section 73. Their appeal to the appellate authority under Section 107 was dismissed as time-barred, having been filed 144 days late, exceeding the maximum condonable delay of one month beyond the initial three months.

Key Issues

Whether the appellate authority under the GST Act has the power to condone delay in filing an appeal beyond the statutory period of four months, and if the High Court can interfere with such a dismissal.

Sections Cited

Section 73, Rule 142, Section 107, Section 4

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 3RD ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 30666 OF 2023 PETITIONER: M/S. ISHA HOLIDAYS (P) LTD., VENNALA, KOCHI, PIN – 682032 REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SRI. V. C. CHARLY RESPONDENTS: 1 THE COMMISSIONER, SGST DEPARTMENT, TAX TOWER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695002. 2 THE STATE TAX OFFICER, SGST DEPARTMENT, CIRCLE II, KALAMASSERI AT KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN – 682030. 3 JOINT COMMISSIONER(APPEALS), SGST DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM AT MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI, PIN – 682002. 4 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110001. BY ADV. SMT. RESHMITA RAMACHANDRAN – GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 30666 OF 2023 2 DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos.30666 of 2023 ------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of September, 2023 JUDGMENT

1.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning Exhibit P

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.