S. Krishnakumar v. Ashok Kumar Singh, Ias

Court
Kerala High Court
Case number
Con.Case(C)/1860/2023
Date of judgment
3 Oct 2023
Bench
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Petitioner
S. KRISHNAKUMAR
Respondent
ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, IAS
CNR
KLHC010601712023

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 11TH ASWINA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1860 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 35250/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER:

S.KRISHNAKUMAR AGED 50 YEARS S/O.SEKHARA PILLAI PWD CONTRACTOR, KOVILVILAKATH VEEDU, KONCHIRAVILA, MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695009 BY ADV AJITH KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS:

1 ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, IAS (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695043 2 BAJI CHANDRAN (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 3 SUNIL RAJ (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SOUTH CIRCLE, IIND FLOOR, CWC BUILDING, L.M.S. COMPOUND, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 4 BINDHU (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,IRRIGATION DIVISION, PUBLIC OFFICE, THIURUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 5 P.B.NOOH, IAS (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) DIRECTOR, TOURISM DEPARTMENT, PARK VIES, VIKASBHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 6 K.BIJU, IAS (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SECRETARY, TOURISM DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695001

CON.CASE(C)NO.1860/2023 2 7 JEROMIC GEORGE, IAS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KUDAPPANAKUNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695043 BY ADV SRI.SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE - GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

CON.CASE(C)NO.1860/2023 3 JUDGMENT When this matter was called today, Sri.Ajith Krishnan – learned counsel for the petitioner, conceded that the bill amount has been paid, but there is an issue regarding Goods and Services Tax (GST). He requested liberty for his client to invoke appropriate remedies for this.

In the afore circumstances, this contempt case is closed with the afore requested liberty being reserved to the petitioner.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/3.10

Original PDF on the eCourts judgment service →

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.