Paccar INDIA PVT. LTD. Pune vs. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Secretary And Ors
Facts
The Petitioner, PACCAR India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a Show Cause Notice dated October 12, 2022, issued by Respondent No. 2, the Deputy Commissioner GST (Appeal). The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary and other respondents, was the opposing party. The Petitioner also sought to keep in abeyance three other Show Cause Notices issued by Respondent No. 3, dated September 15, 2023. The dispute involves tax matters, with the specific amounts not being explicitly stated in the judgment.
Held
The Court did not go into the merits of the matter. The Revenue, through Ms. Vyas, stated on instructions that Respondent No. 2 would withdraw the Show Cause Notice dated October 12, 2022. Furthermore, Respondent No. 2 was directed to decide the Petitioner's appeal in accordance with the law, with a timeline set for disposal by November 30, 2024. Regarding the other three Show Cause Notices issued by Respondent No. 3, the Revenue, on instructions, agreed to keep them in abeyance until the appeals are disposed of by Respondent No. 2. The Court explicitly clarified that no observations were made on the merits of the case. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition based on these agreements.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Show Cause Notice No. DCST/Pune/Appeal-E-001/SCN/Paccar/B-884 dated 12th October 2022, issued by Respondent No. 2, should be withdrawn. The Petitioner likely argued for its withdrawal, while the Revenue's stance was to be determined by instructions. 2. Whether the three Show Cause Notices issued by Respondent No. 3, dated 15.09.2023 (ACST-D-816/Show Cause Adjudication/2023-24/B-530, B-531, and B-532), should be kept in abeyance until the Petitioner's appeal is disposed of by Respondent No. 2. The Petitioner argued for this abeyance, and the Revenue's agreement was sought.
Sections Cited
None discussed
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1/2 25-WP-4712-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4712 OF 2023 PACCAR India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Secretary & Ors. ...Respondents ---- Mr. Jas Sanghavi a/w Mr. Rajan Mishra and Mr. Yash Prakash i/b PDS Legal for Petitioner. Ms. S.D. Vyas, Addl. G.P. for State. Ms. Pradnya Pande, Deputy Commissioner GST (Appeal) present. ---- CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : 20th AUGUST 2024 P.C. :
Without going into the merits of the matter, Ms. Vyas on instructions states that respondent will withdraw, which they hereby do, the Show Cause Notice No. DCST/Pune/Appeal-E-001/SCN/Paccar/B- 884 dated 12th October 2022 issued by Respondent No.
Ms. Vyas further states that Respondent No.2 will proceed to decide petitioner’s appeal in accordance with law and the court would give time till 30th November 2024 to dispose the appeal.
Mr. Sanghavi states that in the meanwhile the three Show Cause Notices issued by Respondent No.3 namely (i) ACST-D-816/Show
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.