M/S. Alpha Drugs vs. The Superintendent
Held
The Court found no error apparent on the face of the record in its previous judgment. While dismissing the review petition, it clarified that the amount of transitional credit mentioned in the earlier judgment would not bind the petitioner regarding any other demanded amounts.
Facts
M/s. Alpha Drugs filed a review petition against a High Court judgment dated 4.10.2023, which had dismissed their writ petition (WP(C) 16507/2023) on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy of appeal. The petitioner contended that they had already filed appeals against the underlying orders.
Key Issues
The key legal issue was whether the High Court's previous judgment, which dismissed a writ petition due to the availability of an appeal remedy, contained an error apparent on the face of the record warranting review.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[RP NO.1176/2023 IN WP(C) No.16507/2023] The present review petition has been filed by the petitioner s
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.