Ashok Pundlik Badgujar vs. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

WP/6987/2020HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM03023990202030 August 2024Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE Y. G. KHOBRAGADE69 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The petitioners are contractual ambulance drivers whose services were terminated by contractors. They have not been paid salaries for periods ranging from 12 to 15 months. The State of Maharashtra, through the Directorate of Health Services, issued a communication on January 24, 2023, directing Zilla Parishads to submit details of salaries payable to these drivers, including GST, and the quantum of funds required for monthly payments. The Zilla Parishads are to fill a specific chart and submit it to the Joint Director of Health Services. The Court is considering multiple writ petitions filed by these drivers challenging their termination and non-payment of salaries.

Held

The Court directed that the minimum pay scale at the lowest grade of regular employees holding the same post shall be paid to the petitioners until further orders. Their services shall not be terminated without leave of the Court, solely in relation to their contractual employment. The concerned Zilla Parishads are to intimate the Joint Director of Health Services, Mumbai, about the quantum of unpaid salaries within 10 days, using the chart annexed to the communication dated January 24, 2023. The Directorate of Health Services is expected to initiate immediate steps to ensure monthly salaries are paid from March 2023. The Zilla Parishad or Contractor will assess arrears from the filing dates of the writ petitions and make payments, either lump-sum or in twelve equated monthly installments. The Court also directed that contractual employees shall not be replaced by new contractual employees, except in cases of misconduct, misdemeanor, death, or other valid reasons. Preference may be given to previously engaged contractual drivers if replacement is necessary. The Principal Employer is directed to directly make payments to the contractual drivers via bank transactions, which will not be a ground for alleging a sham contract. Terminated drivers are at liberty to raise industrial disputes. The Court noted that the State Government can frame a scheme, if desired, in view of the Supreme Court judgment in Secretary, State of Karnataka v/s Umadevi. The Principal Employer can adjust these direct payments against contractor bills and service charges.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Zilla Parishads, as principal employers, are obligated to directly pay the salaries of contractual ambulance drivers, considering the termination of contracts with the deploying agencies? 2. What is the appropriate mechanism for ensuring the payment of arrears of salaries to the contractual ambulance drivers? Petitioner's Arguments: The petitioners argued that they have not been paid salaries for extended periods and that their services have been terminated. They seek directions for the payment of their dues and continuation of their services. They rely on the communication dated January 24, 2023, from the Directorate of Health Services, which indicates a move towards direct payment by Zilla Parishads. Revenue/State's Arguments: The State, through its communication dated January 24, 2023, has acknowledged the issue and initiated a process to gather details for direct payment of salaries. The State's actions suggest an intent to address the non-payment of salaries by the contractors.

Sections Cited

Section 129

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1913.

24wp etc Ambulance Driver group (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

1 WRIT PETITION NO. 1913 OF 2024 NAVNATH BHASKAR DIVE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 2 WRIT PETITION NO. 2139 OF 2024 PANDHARINATH RANGNATH YADAV AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 3 WRIT PETITION NO.10540 OF 2021 NETAJI MAHADEV SALUNKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4920 OF 2024 IN RAST/4472/2023 ZILLA PARISHAD THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OSMANABAD VERSUS NETAJI MAHADEV SALUNKE AND OTHERS AND 4 WRIT PETITION NO. 4891 OF 2020 RAKESH SURESH PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS 2024:BHC-AUG:20579-DB

1913.

24wp etc Ambulance Driver group (2) AND 5 WRIT PETITION NO. 6236 OF 2020 PRAKASH SHANKAR MAHALE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 6 WRIT PETITION NO. 6759 OF 2020 KAILAS BHIKANRAO TAYADE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 7 WRIT PETITION NO. 3703 OF 2021 JANGLU GOMA BH

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.