Beekaylon Synthetics PVT. LTD. vs. The Union Of INDIA And Ors
Held
The Court allowed the Petitioner's prayer to withdraw the Writ Petition. The Court granted the Petitioner liberty to prefer an Appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal. The Court specified that the Petitioner would have two weeks from the date of the order to file the appeal. If the appeal was filed within this two-week period, the period of limitation would not apply. The Court also clarified that all rights and contentions of both parties were kept open. The Writ Petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Facts
The Petitioner, Beekaylon Symthetics Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court. During the pendency of this petition, the GST Appellate Tribunal became functional. The Petitioner sought to withdraw the Writ Petition to prefer an appeal before the newly functional Tribunal. The Respondents, Union of India & Ors., did not oppose this request. The Court was informed that the Petitioner intended to file an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner should be granted leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to prefer an Appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal, given that the Tribunal has become functional during the pendency of the Writ Petition. Petitioner's contention: The Petitioner argued that since the GST Appellate Tribunal is now operational, it would be more appropriate to pursue their grievance before that forum. They requested permission to withdraw the current Writ Petition and file an appeal before the Tribunal. Respondents' contention: The Respondents, represented by Mr. Patricia Cardozo, did not oppose the Petitioner's request for withdrawal and liberty to file an appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
901-WP-5319-2024.DOC Rekha Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5319 OF 2024 Beekaylon Symthetics Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Mr. Jas Sanghvi, for the Petitioners. Mr. Patricia Cardozo with Ms. Niyati Mankad & Priyanka Singh, for the Respondents. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 21st JULY 2026. PC:-
Mr. Jas Sanghvi, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, submits that during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the GST Appellate Tribunal Authority has become functional. Therefore, the Petitioner be granted leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to prefer an Appeal. The prayer is not opposed by Mr. Patricia Cardozo, learned Departmental Counsel, appearing for the Respondent.
In view of the above, prayer is allowed. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to file Appeal.
We make it clear that the Petitioner will have two weeks’ time from today to prefer the Appeal. If the Appeal is filed within REKHA PRAKASH PATIL REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2026.07.22 17:37:23 +0530
901-WP-5319-2024.DOC t
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.