Shri Datt Stone Crusher Thr Its Proprietor Achyut J Murkute vs. The Commissioner State GST Bhavan And Others

WP/10223/2026HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM03032678202619 August 20264 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court, relying on its previous judgments, quashed both the registration cancellation order and the appellate order. It held that the right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) and Article 21 cannot be curtailed by strict adherence to limitation in such cases, and restored the petitioner's GST registration subject to filing up-to-date returns and depositing all pending dues.

Facts

The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled, and their subsequent appeal against the cancellation was rejected by the appellate authority solely on the ground of being filed beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 107 of the MGST Act.

Key Issues

Whether the appellate authority has the power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period for filing an appeal against GST registration cancellation, and whether constitutional courts can intervene when an appeal is rejected solely on limitation grounds, impacting the right to trade.

Sections Cited

Section 107, Section 107(1), Section 107(4), Rule 23(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
{1} wp10223-26.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10223 OF 2026 Shri Datt Stone Crusher Through its Proprietor Achyut J. Murkute PETITIONER VERSUS The Commissioner of State GST and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent - State ....... [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.] DATE : 19 th AUGUST, 2026

ORDER :

1.

By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking following reliefs: “B. That the Hon’ble Court may quash and set aside the order dt.24.11.2024 and permit the petitioner to file the return. C. That the order in Appeal bearing reference no. AD271025017177B dt. 17.11.2025 passed by Commissioner (Appeal) may kindly be quashed and set aside. D. That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly restore the petitioner registration w.e.f. 29.2.2024”

2.

In support of the petition, the Petitioner relies on the following decisions: i. Rohit Enterprises V/s. The Commissioner State GST; 2023 (2) TMI-759 Bom HC. 2026:BHC-AUG:37826-DB

{2} wp10223-26.doc ii. M/s. Sambhaji Multi Services V/s. The Com

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.