The State Of Maharashtra vs. Mr Anurag Awasthi

WP/3748/2026HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM01035738202609 September 202615 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court quashed the lower court orders, finding that they overlooked material evidence suggesting the Gutkha was being sold in Maharashtra despite the ban. The Court emphasized public health and Article 21, prioritizing it over the respondent's commercial interests, and directed the State to destroy the seized goods.

Facts

The State of Maharashtra challenged orders from the JMFC and Additional Sessions Judge that granted interim custody of seized Gutkha (Vimal Pan Masala and Vimal Tobacco) to the respondent, who claimed it was in transit through Maharashtra. The State argued that the goods were intended for sale in Maharashtra, citing a discrepancy between purchased and seized quantities, and that Gutkha is banned in the state.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was whether the lower courts erred in granting interim custody of seized Gutkha, given the State's ban on its sale and evidence suggesting it was being illegally distributed within Maharashtra under the guise of inter-state transport.

Sections Cited

Sections 123, 223, 274, 275 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Sections 7(2), 20(2), 59 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003; Sections 26(2)(i), 26(2)(iv), 59, 30(1), 30(2)(a) to (f) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006; Articles 21, 246(1), 246(2), 246(3) of the Constitution of India; Entry 42 (List I), Entry 26 (List II), Entry 33(b) (List III) of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
4 WP-3748-2026-J.DOC skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3748 OF 2026 The State of Maharashtra (Through Raigad Police Station, Pune) …Petitioner (Orig. Complainant) Vs. Mr. Anurag Awasthi Proprietor of Shiv Traders …Respondent (Orig. Accused) Mr. S.V. Walve, APP for the Applicant-State. Mr. Satyavrat Joshi (through VC) a/w. Mr. Priyesh More and Navaz Durdi, for the Respondent. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2026

JUDGMENT :

1.

Heard Mr. Walve, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner-State and Mr. Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent.

2.

By this Writ Petition, the State of Maharashtra has challenged order dated 6th June 2026 passed by learned JMFC, Court No.1, Pune in Criminal M.A. No.3069 of 2029 by which, the Police Station Officer, Rajgad Police Station has been directed to handover the interim custody of the Vimal Pan Masala (total 115 bags/Goni) and Vimal Tobacco (total 25 bags/Goni) (“Gutkha”) seized in Crime No. 166 of 2026 by Police Station, Rajgad, Pune 9th September, 2026 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR ARJ

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.