Idbi Bank LTD Thru Officer vs. Marigold Manufactures LTD

WP/11653/2026HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM01043366202611 September 20265 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The High Court maintained the lower court's direction for the bank to deposit the outstanding amounts but allowed the respondent (landlord) to withdraw a lesser amount (Rs. 9,80,197.69 per month plus taxes). The court extended the time for deposit by four weeks and left the core dispute regarding the actual area and corresponding liability for the trial court to decide.

Facts

IDBI Bank Ltd. (Petitioner) challenged a lower court order directing it to deposit arrears of license fees/occupation charges, including GST, for premises it occupied. The bank disputed the amount, claiming the actual occupied area was less than stated in the Leave and Licence Agreement, and had been paying a lower rental.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was whether the Petitioner-Bank was liable to deposit license fees/occupation charges, including GST, based on the agreed-upon area or the allegedly smaller actual occupied area, and the validity of the lower court's interim deposit order.

Sections Cited

None

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Gitalaxmi 902-WP-11653-2026.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11653 OF 2026 IDBI BANK LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER MR. DAYANAND ILAKE ...PETITIONER Versus MARIGOLD MANUFACTURES LTD. ...RESPONDENT Mr. Girin N. Pandit, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. Surendra R. Yadav, learned counsel for the Respondent. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026. Per Court :

1.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2.

The learned Trial Court has directed the Petitioner to deposit rentals in terms of the application made under Order 15(A) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, as computed in paragraph 57 at page 68 of the paper-book, which is noted below :- “57. In view of above all discussions, I am therefore, of the view that, regardless of the facts, this is a fit case to exercise jurisdiction to pass an order for deposit of arrears of license 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026

Gitalaxmi

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.