M/S Jsb Trading Company vs. State Of Punjab
Held
The Court held that the petitioner had preferred the writ petition without availing the statutory remedy of filing an appeal as provided under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. The Court allowed the petitioner to raise all the grounds raised in the writ petition before the appellate authority. If such an appeal is filed within 15 days from the date of the order, the same shall be decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed with the liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s JSB Trading Company, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The petitioner approached the Court without availing the statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. The respondents are the State of Punjab and another authority. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The procedural history indicates that the petitioner preferred a writ petition over the appellate remedy.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner has correctly availed the appropriate legal remedy by filing a writ petition instead of pursuing the statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that the writ petition is the appropriate forum to raise all the grounds raised in the petition. Revenue's contention: The revenue contended that the petitioner has bypassed the statutory remedy of filing an appeal as provided under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
111 IN TH M/S JSB TRA STATE OF PU CORAM: H
H Present: **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ **** Mr. Paras Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) tion application No.CM-19909-C nd that the petitioner has prefe g the statutory remedy of filing 107 of the GST Act, 2017. ow the petitioner to raise all th n to be taken up in appeal. If such orth, the same shall be decided e of four months. etition is accordingly dismissed w nding applications also stand dispo
(SANJ 2024 speaking/reasoned?
Y reportable?
Y B AND HARYANA AT H CWP-33083-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.12.2024 . . . . Petitioner . . . . Respondents JEEV PRAKASH SHARMA JAY VASHISTH Punjab. CWP-2024 is allowed as prayed erred this writ petition without of an appeal as provided under he grounds as raised in the writ h an appeal is filed within 15 days
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.