Jagdish Singh Alias Deesha Alias Jagdish Snigh Brar vs. State Of Punjab
Facts
The petitioner, Jagdish Singh alias Disha, sought regular bail for the third time in FIR No. 216, registered on July 21, 2023, under Sections 22-C and 27 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution story, as per the FIR, details the apprehension of the petitioner near Rambagh, Bathinda. Upon noticing the police party, the petitioner attempted to flee. A search of his bag revealed intoxicating vials (100 of OMEREX Cough Syrup containing Codeine Phosphate) and intoxicating tablets (1000 Cariso Prodol Tablets). The petitioner could not produce any license or permit for these substances. The FIR states that the quantity of intoxicant vials and tablets found in possession constitutes an offense under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act.
Held
The Court allowed the petition for regular bail. While the judgment extensively discusses the principles of granting bail, emphasizing that bail is the general rule and incarceration is an exception, and referencing various Supreme Court decisions on the humane and judicious exercise of discretion, it does not explicitly rule on the specific legal arguments raised by the petitioner regarding the classification of the recovered substances under the NDPS Act or the quantity of Codeine. The decision to grant bail appears to be based on the general principles of bail jurisprudence and the petitioner's clean antecedents, as highlighted by the petitioner's counsel. The Court directed the petitioner's release on furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court/duty magistrate. It was explicitly stated that the observations made would not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.
Key Issues
1. Whether the 1000 tablets of Carisoma fall within the ambit of the NDPS Act, and whether the 100 vials of cough syrup contain a quantity of Codeine Phosphate that is considered intermediate under the NDPS Act? 2. Whether the petitioner, having clean antecedents and not being involved in any other case, is entitled to regular bail? Petitioner's Arguments: Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the 1000 tablets of Carisoma do not fall under the NDPS Act. Furthermore, it was argued that the 100 vials of cough syrup contained no more than 30 grams of Codeine, which is an intermediate quantity. The petitioner also asserted that he has clean antecedents and is not involved in any other cases. Revenue's Arguments: The judgment does not record any specific arguments presented by the respondent State of Punjab.
Sections Cited
Section 22-C, Section 27, Section 50, Section 439
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
CRM-M-63811-2024 -1- 222
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-63811-2024 DECIDED ON: 07.01.2025
JAGDISH SINGH ALIAS DEESHA ALIAS JAGDISH SNIGH BRAR
.....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB
.....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
Relief sought The juri iction of this Court has been invoked for the third time under Section 439 Cr.P.C. (483 of BNSS, 2023) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.216, dated 21.07.2023, under Sections 22-C, 27 of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station STF Phase IV (Mohali), District SAS Nagar, Mohali.
Prosecution story setup in the present case as per the version in the FIR as under: Copy of Ruqa, To, the Station House Officer, Police Station Special Task Force, SAS Nagar, Jai Hind. Today myself ASI along with ASI Bhupinder Singh No. 106/BTD, ASI Sukhmandar Singh NO. 1609/BTD, HC Raju Singh No. 2146/Ludhiana, SCT * No. 1402/BTD, POONAM NEGI 2025.01.07 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this docu
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.