Sterile INDIA Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST Division And Another
Facts
The petitioner, Sterile India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST Division Sonepat, and another authority. The petitioner sought to challenge a show cause notice dated July 16, 2024, and an order dated December 17, 2024. After arguing the matter, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition to pursue an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against the impugned order.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's counsel's submission that they wished to avail the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against the impugned show cause notice and order. The Court granted the liberty as prayed for. The ratio decidendi is that High Courts may permit withdrawal of writ petitions when a party intends to pursue a statutory appeal, especially when such a remedy is available and appropriate. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with the liberty granted.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition to pursue an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The petitioner argued that they should be permitted to withdraw the petition to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, as the order dated December 17, 2024, and the show cause notice dated July 16, 2024, were assailable through this statutory remedy. The revenue or State did not record any specific arguments in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6578-2025 Date of decision: 10.03.2025 Sterile India Private Limited …. Petitioner Vs.
Assistant Commissioner, Central GST Division Sonepat and another ….. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. S. Sunil, Advocate, for the petitioner. ARUN PALLI, J (Oral)
Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner, as always, fairly submits that he be permitted to withdraw the petition, to enable the petitioner to assail the impugned show cause notice dated July 16, 2024, as the order dated December 17, 2024, by way of an appeal under Section 107 the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 10.03.2025 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2025.03.11 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.