Joginder Nath Gupta And Sons vs. Engineer In Chief Military Engineer Services And Another
Facts
The petitioner, Joginder Nath Gupta, approached the High Court of Punjab and Haryana challenging an unspecified order or action by the Engineer in Chief, Military Engineer Services, and another respondent. The tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the High Court's intervention is also not detailed. The case was presented before the Court for a decision.
Held
The Court did not make a substantive ruling on the merits of the GST issue. Instead, the respondents' counsel stated that the petitioner would be required to file an affidavit confirming that they have not claimed any benefit under GST as a HUF. Upon filing this affidavit, the respondents assured the Court that the petitioner's case would be processed and completed within two weeks. In light of this submission and assurance, the petitioner's counsel indicated that no further orders were necessary from the Court. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition based on this understanding and undertaking.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether to grant relief to the petitioner. The primary issue revolved around the petitioner's claim concerning the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its treatment as a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). The petitioner's counsel sought a resolution to this matter. The respondents, through their counsel, proposed a procedural step to resolve the petitioner's grievance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH 203 CWP-16744 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:05.06.2025 Joginder Nath Gupta
....Petitioner(s) Versus Engineer in Chief, Military Engineer Services and another .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate, for the respondents. **** ANIL KSHETARPAL
, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the respondents submits that the petitioner is required to file an affidavit to the effect that he has not taken benefit of GST as HUF and thereafter the petitioner’s case will be processed and completed within a period of 2 weeks.
In view of the aforesaid statement, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that no further order is required to be passed in this regard.
Disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL)
JUDGE (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA)
JUDGE June 05, 2025
dinesh
Whether speaki
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.