Ms Raj Trading Company vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Held
The Court held that the writ petition could be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal in terms of paragraphs 4 and 5 of Circular No. 11.07.2024. The reasoning was based on the fact that the order of the Additional Commissioner was appealable, but the GST Appellate Tribunal was not functional. The Circular provided a mechanism for taxpayers to make pre-deposit payments and file an undertaking to appeal to the Tribunal once it becomes operational, thereby staying the recovery of the remaining confirmed demand. The Court did not delve into the merits of the orders passed by the Superintendent or the Additional Commissioner, nor did it decide on the validity of the demand itself. The operative direction was to permit the petitioner to follow the procedure outlined in the Circular.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Raj Trading Company, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana challenging an order dated 23.03.2023 passed by the Superintendent, Central Goods & Services Tax Division, Karnal, and a subsequent order dated 24.10.2024 passed by the Additional Commissioner, CGST Appeals, Panchkula. The petitioner acknowledged that the order of the Additional Commissioner was appealable. However, due to the non-functional status of the Goods and Services Tax Tribunal, the present writ petition was filed. The court noted a relevant Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST dated 11.07.2024, issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, which provides a procedure for taxpayers to deposit pre-deposit amounts and file an undertaking for future appeals to the Appellate Tribunal.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner can be granted liberty to file an appeal in terms of Paragraphs 4 and 5 of Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST dated 11.07.2024, given the non-functional status of the GST Appellate Tribunal? The petitioner argued that they should be allowed to file an appeal in accordance with the aforementioned circular, submitting the pre-deposit and the requisite affidavit within two weeks. The revenue or State did not record any specific arguments in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 112
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.20403 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 M/s Raj Trading Company …..Petitioner. Versus Union of India and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ***** Present:- Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate
for the petitioner.
LISA GILL, J.(Oral)
Prayer in this writ petition is for setting-aside order dated 23.03.2023 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.2-Superintendent, Central Goods & Services Tax Division, Range-22, Karnal as well as order dated 24.10.2024 (Annexure P-8) passed by Additional Commissioner, CGST Appeals, Panchkula.
Admittedly, order dated 24.10.2024 (Annexure P-8) passed by Additional Commissioner, CGST Appeals, Panchkula, is an appealable order. However, as Goods and Services Tax Tribunal is not functional, present writ petition has been filed.
At this stage, it is to be noted that Circular No.224/18/2024- GST dated 11.07.2024 has been issued by Government of India, Mini
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.