Post Graduate Institute Of Medical Education And Research vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Held
The Court decided to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail of its remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal. The reasoning behind this decision is that the petitioner explicitly sought to withdraw the petition and pursue its recourse through the designated appellate authority. The Court granted this request, allowing the petitioner to pursue the matter before the GST Appellate Tribunal. No specific issues related to GST law were decided on merits, as the petition was withdrawn. The operative direction is the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty granted.
Facts
The petitioner, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Union of India and others. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge, along with the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history indicates that the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether to allow the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner, represented by Mr. KPS Virk and Ms. Payal Sharma, sought liberty to avail of its remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the revenue or state respondents regarding the withdrawal request. Therefore, the Court's decision hinges solely on the petitioner's plea and the Court's discretion to grant such a liberty.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE Post Graduate
Union of India CORAM : H
H
Present : M
M
DEEPAK SIB
L petition with l Appellate Trib
D
2025 Prince
Whether speaking/r
Whether reportable
Sr. No.122 E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
CWP-2942 Date of De
Institute of Medical Education &
Versus a and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. KPS Virk, Advocate and Ms. Payal Sharma, Advocate for t *** BAL, J. (Oral) earned counsel for the petitio iberty to the petitioner to avail bunal. Dismissed as withdrawn with libe
(DEEPA
J
(LAPIT
J reasoned :
Yes/No e :
Yes/No B AND HARYANA AT H 22-2025 ecision : 12.11.2025 & Research …Petitioner
…Respondents AK SIBAL A BANERJI
the petitioner.
oner seeks to withdraw this of its remedy before the GST erty as prayed for. AK SIBAL) JUDGE
TA BANERJI)
JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2025.11.13 21:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.