Laxmi Metal And And Machines Through Its Partner Satish Kumar Joon vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors

CWP/24192/2025HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01129796202528 November 2025Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court held that the Appellate Authority erred in calculating the period of limitation for filing the appeal. The Court found that the appeal was filed within the permissible period, considering the exclusion of the date of communication and the extended period allowed under Section 107(4).

Facts

The petitioner deposited IGST on ocean freight under RCM, which was later held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The petitioner sought a refund, but their refund claim was rejected. The appeal against the rejection was dismissed by the Appellate Authority solely on the ground of a one-day delay.

Key Issues

The primary issue was whether the appeal filed before the Appellate Authority was time-barred. The court also considered the correct computation of limitation period for appeals under the CGST Act.

Sections Cited

Section 65, Section 107, Section 107(1), Section 107(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

CWP-24192-2025 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

105

CWP-24192-2025 (O&M)

Date of decision :28.11.2025

LAXMI METAL AND MACHINES THROUGH ITS PARTNER SH. SATISH KUMAR JOON

... PETITIONER

VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

Present: Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advocate (through V.C.)

for the respondents.

**** LISA GILL, J. (ORAL)

CM-17748-CWP-2025

Documents Annexure P-12 to P-16 are taken on record, subject to just exceptions.

Application is disposed of accordingly. Main Case

1.

Prayer in this writ petition is for setting-aside of order-in-original dated 24.01.2024 (Annexure P-4) and order in appeal dated 19.06.2025 (Annexure P-7).

2.

Petitioner, it is submitted, is a partnership firm engaged in the business of trading in used imported machinery, operating from Rohtak, Haryan

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.