Prince Kumar And Anr vs. State Of Punjab And Anr

CRM-M/33635/2025HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01097402202503 December 2025Bench: MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY14 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court granted bail to the petitioners, noting that the maximum punishment for the offense is five years and that the trial is likely to take time. The Court emphasized that denial of bail is an exception in economic offenses and that the evidence is primarily documentary and electronic.

Facts

The petitioners are accused of creating and operating 34 bogus firms to generate fake invoices and fraudulently avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to approximately Rs. 81.61 crores. They were arrested and have been in custody since March 5, 2025.

Key Issues

The primary issue was whether the petitioners should be granted bail given the serious allegations of GST fraud and their prolonged custody. The court also considered the nature of the evidence and the potential duration of the trial.

Sections Cited

Section 132(1)(B), Section 132(1)(c), Section 132(1), Section 20, Section 70

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

CRM-M- IN

230 Prince Ku

v. State of P

CORAM

Present:

AARADH 1. been file COMA/63 Intelligen commissi punishabl Tax Act, Integrated 2. created/se members, -33635-2025

-1- N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIG

umar and another

Punjab and another

M: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE A Mr. Vipin Ghai, Senior Advo Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Adv Mr. Gautam Thapar, Sr. DAG Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior A Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate Mr. Parth Sharma, Advocate **** HNA SAWHNEY, J. (Oral) This petition for grant of bai ed by petitioners, an accus 309/2025 dated 3.5.2025, titl nce v. Prince Kumar and anoth on of offences punishable und le with Sub Clause (i) of Section 2017 (in short “the CGST A d Goods and Service Tax Act, 20 In brief, the allegation a etup an elaborate network of , 30 of which were bogus

JAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRM-M-33635-2025 Date of Decision: 03.12.202

…Petitioners.

…Respondents. AARADHNA SAWHNEY. ocate with vocate for the petitioners. G, Punjab.

Advocate with and for respondent No.2. il under Section 483 of BNSS, ed in criminal complaint N led “Director General of G her” registered against them for

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.