Sanket Mittal vs. Central GST Department

CRM-M/44925/2025HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01128998202518 December 2025Bench: MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY14 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner, noting that the evidence against him is primarily documentary and that his continued incarceration might violate his right to a speedy trial. The Court emphasized that bail is the rule and imprisonment is the exception, even in economic offense cases.

Facts

The petitioner was arrested for allegedly being the mastermind behind a firm that availed fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to over Rs. 30 crores by creating fake invoices. The petitioner's bail application was dismissed by the lower courts.

Key Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail given the allegations of large-scale tax evasion and the nature of evidence. The court also considered the principles of "bail is the rule and imprisonment is the exception" in economic offenses.

Sections Cited

Section 132, Rule 86A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

CRM-M-

IN

231 Sanket M

v. Central G

CORAM

Present:

AARADH

1.

Associatio 2. been file COMA/51 Superinte another,” short “the 3. mobile ph on the GS availed IT had passe -44925-2025 -1 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIG

Mittal

GST Department

M: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE A Mr. Dheeraj Mittal, father of Mr. Sanket Mittal, petitioner

None for the respondent. **** HNA SAWHNEY, J. (Oral) Upon a call given by Punj on, the Members of the Bar are a This petition for grant of bai ed by petitioner, an accuse 18/2025 dated 5.7.2025, title endent, CGST Commissioner ” under Section 132 of Central e CGST Act”). M/s Balaji Mobile Addition hones (especially I-phones). On ST Portal, it came to notice tha TC from various suppliers inclu ed on ineligible ITC to the tune 1- JAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRM-M-44925-2025 Date of Decision: 18.12.202

…Petitioner.

…Respondent. AARADHNA SAWHNEY. f jab and Haryana High Court B abstaining from work. il under Section 483 of BNSS, ed in criminal complaint N ed “Mr. Vikas Kumar Verm rate v. Sh. Sanket Mittal a Goods Service Tax Act, 2017 has been engaged in the trading n perusal of GST retur

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.