Ms Gsj Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s GSJ Enterprises, had its GST registration cancelled by an order dated March 19, 2026. The petitioner approached the High Court through a writ petition challenging this cancellation order. During the proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner requested liberty to file a fresh petition to challenge the order dated March 19, 2026, which had led to the cancellation of its GST registration. The Court noted that it had neither commented on the merits of the case nor on the maintainability or entertainability of the petition.
Held
The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The withdrawal was granted with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition to challenge the order dated March 19, 2026, which led to the cancellation of its GST registration. The Court explicitly clarified that by granting this liberty, it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, nor on the maintainability or entertainability of any future petition that the petitioner might file. The operative direction was to permit the withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition challenging the GST registration cancellation order dated March 19, 2026? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner, through its counsel, requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner sought liberty to file a fresh petition to challenge the order dated March 19, 2026, which resulted in the cancellation of its GST registration. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments or contentions from the respondent (Union of India and others).
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
hallenge the afore referred order Dismissed as withdrawn with libe t is clarified that while grantin mented on the merits on the c y of the remedy that the petitione
(DEEPA
J (LAPIT
J
026
king/reasoned :
Yes/No rtable :
Yes/No B AND HARYANA AT H 9-2026 (O&M) ecision : 19.03.2026
…Petitioner …Respondents AK SIBAL A BANERJI er submits that through order stration stands cancelled and s petition with liberty to the dated 19.03.2026. erty as prayed for. ng the afore liberty, we have case nor the maintainability/ er may avail. AK SIBAL) JUDGE
TA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.03.24 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.