Kashish Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors

CWP/17027/2026HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01090783202629 May 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA,MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Kashish Gupta, proprietor of M/s Balaji Industries, holding GSTIN 06CNMPG8477NIZC, filed a writ petition seeking directions to respondents 2 and 3 to restore and reactivate their GSTIN. The petition was initially filed challenging a show cause notice. However, during the pendency of the petition, an order of cancellation was passed. The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the cancellation order had been passed and sought to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one if a new cause of action arose.

Held

The Court noted that the petitioner had initially filed the writ petition challenging a show cause notice. However, subsequently, an order of cancellation of the GSTIN had been passed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in light of the cancellation order, they wished to withdraw the present petition. The Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one if a new cause of action arises. The Court disposed of the pending applications as well.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to seek directions for the restoration and reactivation of their GSTIN, given that a cancellation order has now been passed? The petitioner argued that the petition was initially filed to challenge a show cause notice. However, since a cancellation order has now been issued, they wished to withdraw the current petition. The petitioner sought liberty to file a fresh petition should a new cause of action arise. The respondents (Union of India & Ors.) did not present any arguments as the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17027-2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 KASHISH GUPTA ….PeƟƟoner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS ….Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Utkarsh Khatana, Advocate Ms. SwaƟ Vashisth, Advocate for the peƟƟoner. **** ANOOP CHITKARA

, J. (Oral)

1.

Prayer in the present peƟƟon is for issuance of direcƟons to respondent Nos.2 & 3 for restoring and reacƟvaƟng the GSTIN of the peƟƟoner, sole proprietor of M/s Balaji Industries bearing GST No.06CNMPG8477NIZC. Taken up on menƟoning.

2.

Learned counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that the present peƟƟon has been filed to challenge the show cause noƟce but now cancellaƟon order has been passed, as such, he wants to withdraw the present peƟƟon with liberty to file fresh in case a lis again sprouts. Pending applicaƟon(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

3.

Given above, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) May 29, 2026

JUDGE Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable:

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.