Santhosh Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA

CRL MP(MD)/10055/2026HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01063962202611 June 2026Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Santhosh Kumar, filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CRL MP(MD). No.10055 of 2026) before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. This petition sought relaxation of a condition previously imposed in CRL OP(MD). No.825 of 2026, dated 26.02.2026. The respondent was the Union of India, represented by the Senior Intelligence Officer of the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Madurai Regional Unit. The petition was filed under Section 439(1)(b) of the Cr.P.C. The specific nature of the GST dispute or the amount in dispute was not detailed in the provided text, nor were the specific tax periods or the original order being challenged.

Held

The Court did not decide the substantive merits of the petition. Instead, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement to that effect. Recording this withdrawal, the Court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. Therefore, no finding was reached on the core issue of relaxing the condition imposed in the earlier order. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn. No specific GST provisions were discussed or applied in reaching this conclusion.

Key Issues

The court had to decide whether to grant the petitioner's request for relaxation of a condition imposed in a previous order. The petitioner, Santhosh Kumar, sought this relaxation under Section 439(1)(b) of the Cr.P.C. The respondent was the Union of India, represented by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of GST Intelligence. The judgment does not explicitly frame the issues as questions of law or mixed law and fact, nor does it name specific provisions of GST law that were central to the dispute. The petitioner's argument was implicitly that the condition imposed in the prior order should be relaxed. The respondent's argument is not recorded in the provided text.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Juri iction ) Date : 11/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL in CRL OP(MD). No.825 of 2026 Santhosh Kumar, S/o.Rengaiah, ... Petitioner/Accused

Vs The Union of India, Rep by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of Gst Intelligence Office, Madurai Regional Unit, Madurai.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.AVK. Kiranraj

For Respondent : Mr.R.Mohamed Riyaz Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.439(1)b of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD)No.825 of 2026 dated 26.02.206 on the file of this Court. 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect.

2.

Recording the same, this Crim

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.