Tvl. Q.816 Ramanathapuram Dt. Consumer Co. Op. Wholesale Society LTD vs. The State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Before: and
This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 23.12.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act 2017. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Standing Counsel representing the revenue.
By the impugned order, the assessment was made ex parte because the petitioner did not utilise the opportunities provided. The discrepancies and grounds on which the assessment order was issued, the dealer’s explanation on merits, and the reasons for not participating in the assessment proceedings are summarised briefly and presented in a table below: 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Discrepancies found/Grounds
on which the order is passed Explanation offered by the Assessee on merits Explanation for not availing the opportunity Reconciliation
of GSTR-01
with GSTR-09 The difference of tax is nothing but sales returns. The above sales return already reflected in Returns but the respondent has not properly verified and directly passed the impugned order. The show cause notice and impugned
assessment
order uploaded in the GST Portal due to without knowledge of the petitioner. The Accountant never informed in the above. Excess claim of ITC w.r.t The petitioner has claimed only the eligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the inward supply effected from the registered dealers and also duly reported outward supply through his returns and also paid the corresponding tax due to the department then and there through returns. Thus, what have reported through GSTR-1 statement and paid through GSTR-3B return is correct. However, there is no difference between GSTR-3Band GSTR-2A. The show cause notice and impugned
assessment
order uploaded in the GST Portal due to without knowledge of the petitioner. The Accountant never informed in the above. ITC to be reversed on non-business transactions
& exempt supplies The petitioner has claimed only the eligible ITC on the inward supply of goods which is used only in the taxable outward supply and thus I have not claimed any ITC on inward supply which is used for exempted outward supply of goods. The entire assessment on the pure guess that I have used the ITC commonly both for taxable and exempted
goods
and thereby apportioning the same towards taxable and exempted goods is highly unjustified and unlawful. The show cause notice and impugned
assessment
order uploaded in the GST Portal due to without knowledge of the petitioner. The Accountant never informed in the above. Claim of ineligible ITC u/s. 17(5) The entire claim of ITC genuine as per section 16 of the Act. If once verification of entire documents then and there is no ineligible claim of ITC as per the provisions of the Act. The show cause notice and impugned
assessment
order uploaded in the GST Portal due to without knowledge of the petitioner. The Accountant never informed in the above. 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Considering the nature of the discrepancies noted, the explanation provided by the assessee and the reason given before this Court for not availing the opportunity, I believe that an opportunity can be granted to the assessee to present their submissions and produce the relevant supporting documents before the respondent assessing officer. This Court has been extending such opportunities on equitable grounds; however, under appropriate conditions. Therefore, an opportunity is granted to the petitioner assessee on the condition of depositing 25% of the disputed tax amount.
In view of this, the writ petition is allowed on the following terms:- i. Within four weeks of receiving the web copy of the order, the petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount with the respondent, without waiting for a certified copy of the order. ii. Upon such deposit, the impugned orders dated 23.12.2025 shall stand set aside, and the matter shall stand remanded back to the file of the respondent. 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis iii. The assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law. iv. Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall stand raised. v. No costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition shall stand closed. 24.06.2026 NCC:Yes/No rgm To The State Tax Officer, Ramanathapuram Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Department, Ramanathapuram - 623 501. 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
, J.
rgm and W.M.P(MD)No.12979 of 2026 24.06.2026 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.