G.Kannan vs. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police (Crime), Vilakkuthoon
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, G. Kannan, filed a Criminal Revision Case before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court challenging the first condition of an order passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai District, in Crl.MP.No.3628 of 2025 dated 27.01.2026. The petitioner argued that revenue authorities were not issuing solvency certificates following G.O.(Ms)No.282 dated 26.05.2026. This Government Order, issued by the Revenue and Disaster Management Department, indicated that solvency certificates were no longer considered relevant for determining financial stability. Instead, the G.O. listed several alternative documents that could be relied upon. The petitioner sought to have the condition requiring a solvency certificate struck off.
Held
The Court allowed the Criminal Revision Case by modifying the first condition of the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai District. The Court noted that G.O.(Ms)No.282 dated 26.05.2026 clearly indicated that solvency certificates are no longer relevant for determining financial stability. The G.O. listed several alternative documents, such as Income Tax Clearance Certificate, Auditor's Certificate, Audited Accounts certificate, Annual turnover report, Audited Balance Sheets, GST and VAT Clearance Certificate, and Bank Guarantee, which are now considered more reliable indicators of financial strength. The Court reasoned that in view of the G.O., the existing process for issuing solvency certificates has been discontinued and alternatives are to be used. Accordingly, the Court directed the petitioner to produce a Bank Guarantee for an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as per the G.O., instead of producing a solvency certificate, to establish his actual financial stability. The issue of whether the original condition was legally sound in the first place, independent of the G.O., was not expressly left undecided, but the modification was based on the G.O.'s directives.
Key Issues
1. Whether the condition imposed by the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai District, requiring the petitioner to produce a solvency certificate is sustainable in light of the subsequent Government Order (G.O.(Ms)No.282 dated 26.05.2026)? Petitioner's argument: The petitioner contended that the issuance of solvency certificates has been discontinued by revenue authorities subsequent to G.O.(Ms)No.282. This G.O. explicitly states that solvency certificates are no longer relevant for assessing financial stability and lists several alternative documents that can be used for this purpose. Therefore, the condition imposed by the Magistrate is no longer feasible or appropriate. Respondent's argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the respondent (The State of Tamilnadu Rep By the Inspector of Police (Crime)).
Sections Cited
GST and VAT Clearance Certificate
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Challenging the first condition of the order, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai District, in Crl.MP.No.3628 of 2025 dated 27.01.2026, this Criminal Revision is filed.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the issuance of G.O.(Ms)No.282 the Revenue and Disaster Management Department Revenue Administration Wing RA-3(2) Section, dated 26.05.2026, the revenue authorities, are not issuing solvency certificates and sought the indulgence of this Code to struck off the first condition.
A careful perusal of the above said GO, would make it clear that instead of solvency, the following documents can be considered.
The current challenges observed in the existing process for the issuance of Solvency Certificate has been placed before the Empowered Committee. The Empowered Committee in its meeting on 01.04.2025 perused and considered the minutes of Screening committee on the possibilitieso f simplification of procedures in issuing Solvency Certificate as follows:- 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (I) It was discussed that citizens faced significant challenges in obtaining a Solvency Certificate due to its one- time validity, requiring frequent reapplications whenever needed. Also the current process involves extensive documentation, difficulties in acquiring key certificates such as the Liability Amount Certificate and Mortgage Certificate and delays caused by the discretionary authority of officials, making the entire procedure complex and inconsistent. (ii) More so, it was observed that the Solvency Certificate is no longer relevant and relied upon as an indicator of financial stability or strength for the execution of projects. Actual financial stability and strength is often determined by other alternatives that ar mentioned as tender conditions and includes a combination of some of the following:- a) Income Tax Clearance Certificate b) Auditor's Certificate c) Audited Accounts certificate d) Annual turnover report e) Recent Audited Balance Sheets f) GST and VAT Clearance Certificate g) Solvency Certificate / Capability Certificate from banks h) Bank Account Statement i) Bank Guarantee 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis j) IT Returns k) Credit Line Certificate l) PAN Card m) Collateral documents that are kept for the issue of loans n) CRISIL rating and the like. (III) These alternatives have made the Solvency Certificate redundant and all institutions tend not to rely on it for financial strength and stability to execute project or for other purposes. Instead, the alternatives submitted above have become the indicator of financial strength and stability and appear to be far more reliable and binding on the parties involved. (IV) After a detailed discussion, the Committee unanimusly decided. * That the existing process for issuance of Solvency Certificate be discontinued. * That the Finance Department shall issue the necessary instructions to amend the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000 and other prevailing orders accordingly in the light of the available currently relevant alternatives." The above documents can be utilised for determining actual financial stability and strength. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
In view of the above, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed by modifying the first condition of the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai District, in Crl.MP.No.3628 of 2025 dated 27.01.2026, directing the petitioner to produce Bank Guarantee for an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as per the above G.O., instead of producing solvency certificate, to establish his actual financial stability. 05.08.2026 NCC : yes / no Index :yes / no pnn To 1. The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai District.
The Inspector of Police (Crime), Vilakkuthoon, Police Station, Madurai District. (In Crime No.160 of 2025).
The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis L. VICTORIA GOWRI, J pnn
ORDER IN CRL RC(MD) No.1297 of 2026 Date : 05/08/2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.