Sri. Shashi Kumar S vs. The State Of Karnataka

Original PDF →
WP/21737/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01050189202310 December 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR6 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. DILLI RAJAN, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. K. HEMA KUMAR, AGA FOR R1, R5 TO R7 AND R9 SRI. ARVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4 SRI. B.R. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R8

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52397 WP No. 21737 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 21737 OF 2023 (T-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHASHI KUMAR S S/O SRINIVASA S AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS KURUBARAHALLI D MALLANAYAKANAHALLI KOLAR KARNATAKA - 563 136 2. SRI VINAY CHAND N S/O NAGARAJU B AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS NO 989, 14TH MAIN 9TH CROSS, T K LAYOUT VTC MYSORE DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 570 009 3. SRI B NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O BOREGOWDA NO 898, 14TH MAIN ROAD 9TH CROSS, T K LAYOUT MYSORE DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 570 009 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DILLI RAJAN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52397 WP No. 21737 of 2023 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA FINANCE DEPARTMENT II FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 (REP BY ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY) 2. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI 110 001 (REP BY ITS SECRETARY) 3. THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL JANAPATH CONNAUGHT PLACE NEW DELHI 110001 (REP BY SPECIAL SECRETARY) 4. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX NO 1, QUEENS ROAD VASANTHI NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 001 5. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA 1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 009 6. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER ENFORCEMENT-5 MYSORE ZONE MYSORE - 570 001 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52397 WP No. 21737 of 2023 7. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DGSTO MYS, SESHADRI BHAVAN DIWAN ROAD MYSORE - 570 024 8. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MYSORE CITY CORPORATION MYSORE - 570 001 9. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATHRAJ ENGINEERING DIVISION APOLLO HOSPITAL ROAD KUVEMPU NAGAR MYSORE - 570 001 10. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CAUVERY NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD NO.2, VARUNA CANAL DIVISION MYSORE - 570 002 11. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWP AND IWTD DIVISION KOLAR - 561 211 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. HEMA KUMAR, AGA FOR R1, R5 TO R7 AND R9 SRI. ARVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4 SRI. B.R. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R8) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DECLARE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF GST ACT IS INAPPLICABLE IN RESPECT OF WORKS CONTRACT WHERE PROVISIONS OF SERVICE ARE MADE PRIOR TO 01/07/2017 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND CONSEQUENTLY THAT THE R4 TO R7 HAVE - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52397 WP No. 21737 of 2023 NO JURISDICTION TO EITHER ISSUE NOTICE OR TO TAKE ANY COERCIVE STEPS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE GST ACT DATED 01.07.2017 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-H AND H1 ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

1.

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs; "(a) Declare that the provisions of GST Act is inapplicable in respect of works contract where provisions of service are made prior to 01.07.2017 in so far as petitioners are concerned and consequently that the respondent Nos 4 to 7 have no juri iction to either issue notice or to take any coercive steps against the Petitioners under the provisions of the GST Act dated 1.07.20/7produced as Annexure-H.CH (b) Declare that, GST being an Indirect tax is based on the concept of collect and pay, and the liability to pay is on the taxable person after collecting it from recipient of goods or services i.e from the employer of works contract (Respondent No. 8 to 11); AND hence direct Respondent | being the State Government to direct the Respondents 8 to 11 to pay/refund the tax amounts to some of the Petitioners who have already paid GST without collecting it from the Respondents 8 to 11; (c) Pass such other orders as may be deemed appropriate under the circumstances of the case, in the ends of justice." HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52397

2.

WP No.9721/2019 and connected matters within the stipulated time frame.

3.

Submission is placed on record.

4.

The petition stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to submit the representation to the respondent within a period of four weeks from today.

5.

If such a representation along with the relevant documents are submitted by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and proceed further and pass an appropriate order / take appropriate decision HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52397 in accordance with law, bearing in mind the judgment Karnataka and others in WP No.9721/2019 and connected matters.

6.

Subject to aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 28

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.