M/S Shivaji Manohar Rathod vs. Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “(A) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction or order to quash the impugned Recovery Notice bearing GEXCOM/TAR/D/ST/2076/2025-TAR-O/o COMMR-CGST dated 17.07.2025 is enclosed as Annexure-A. (B) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction or order to quash impugned Order in Original dated 08.09.2022 bearing No.36/2022-23 and having Digital Identification No.(‘DIN’) 20220950000000AFF9. Copy of the said Order in Original dated 08.09.2022 is enclosed as Annexure-B for the reasons stated in the grounds. (C) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction or order to quash the impugned the Show Cause Notice HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54149 dated 27.04.2021bearing SCN No.220/2021-22 and having Digital Identification No.(‘DIN’) 20210457YV0500004E7A, enclosed as Annexure-C the reasons stated in the grounds.”
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust Vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax in WP No.11154/2023 & connected matters dated 03.07.2024, wherein it was held as under; "
Accordingly, the following: ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54149 light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the orders-in-original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e. be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside."
Under these circumstances, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Accordingly, the impugned Order-in-original at Annexure-B dated 08.09.2022 and the impugned Recovery Notice at Annexure-A dated 17.07.2025, are hereby quashed. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54149
The matter is remitted back to the concerned respondent to the stage of post show cause notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.
Ordered accordingly. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BMC List No.: 4 Sl No.: 1
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.