M/S Vidhathri Bhawan vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax

WP/37133/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01079685202517 December 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR3 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court accepted the submission that the writ petitions related to GST disputes were disposed of by a separate order on December 17, 2025, and therefore, no further orders were required for the majority of the listed petitions. However, in the specific case of W.P.No.35830/2025, it was noted that the Revenue had filed a writ appeal (W.A.No.1089/2026) against the common order. The Division Bench, by its order dated April 24, 2026, had restored the writ appeal for reconsideration and directed that it be adjudicated on merits. In light of this development and after hearing the Revenue's counsel, the Court decided to de-tag W.P.No.35830/2025 and directed it to be re-listed for Preliminary Hearing on August 11, 2026. The ratio for the other petitions is that once a matter is disposed of by a specific order, no further orders are needed unless there are subsequent developments or directions for reconsideration.

Facts

The petitioners, including M/s. Edge Solutions, filed writ petitions challenging orders related to GST. These petitions were initially listed along with other matters. However, the counsels for the parties indicated that the dispute pertains to GST and that these specific petitions were disposed of by a separate order dated December 17, 2025. For W.P.No.35830/2025, it was submitted that the writ petition was disposed of based on a common order. The Revenue had filed an appeal (W.A.No.1089/2026) against this common order, and the Division Bench, by an order dated April 24, 2026, restored the matter for reconsideration, directing that the writ appeal be adjudicated on merits. The learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue was heard in light of this order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petitions concerning GST disputes, which were disposed of by a common order dated December 17, 2025, require further adjudication by this Court, considering the Revenue has filed a writ appeal against the said common order. (Question of law) Petitioner's contention: The writ petitions were disposed of by a separate order on December 17, 2025, and no further orders are required. For W.P.No.35830/2025, the matter has been restored for reconsideration by the Division Bench in W.A.No.1089/2026, which is to be adjudicated on merits. Revenue's contention: The Revenue has filed a writ appeal (W.A.No.1089/2026) against the common order dated December 17, 2025, and the Division Bench has directed reconsideration of the writ appeal on merits. The Revenue's counsel was heard in light of this order.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (27 matters)

WP NO. 22647/2022
WP NO. 1978/2023
WP NO. 3245/2023
WP NO. 7296/2023
WP NO. 31857/2024
WP NO. 1979/2025
WP NO. 7470/2025
WP NO. 18673/2025
WP NO. 22726/2025
WP NO. 23182/2025
WP NO. 23337/2025
WP NO. 31043/2025
WP NO. 32239/2025
WP NO. 32453/2025
WP NO. 33871/2025
WP NO. 33952/2025
WP NO. 34375/2025
WP NO. 34477/2025
WP NO. 34484/2025
WP NO. 35830/2025
WP NO. 36603/2025
WP NO. 36814/2025
WP NO. 37133/2025
WP NO. 37141/2025
WP NO. 37239/2025
WP NO. 37844/2025
WP NO. 37864/2025

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
WP NO. 22647/2022 (T - RES) Connected Cases: WP NO. 1978/2023, WP NO. 3245/2023, WP NO. 7296/2023, WP NO. 31857/2024, WP NO. 1979/2025, WP NO. 7470/2025, WP NO. 18673/2025, WP NO. 22726/2025, WP NO. 23182/2025, WP NO. 23337/2025, WP NO. 31043/2025, WP NO. 32239/2025, WP NO. 32453/2025, WP NO. 33871/2025, WP NO. 33952/2025, WP NO. 34375/2025, WP NO. 34477/2025, WP NO. 34484/2025, WP NO. 35830/2025, WP NO. 36603/2025, WP NO. 36814/2025, WP NO. 37133/2025, WP NO. 37141/2025, WP NO. 37239/2025, WP NO. 37844/2025, WP NO. 37864/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU [M/S. EDGE SOLUTIONS VS. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF AND OTHERS] 07.07.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

ORAL ORDER The petitions were listed for a common decision and separate daily common orders are passed specific to certain petitions, including these petitions. The order relevant to these petitions read as under. "IN W.P.No.22647/2022 and 26 Connected Matters1

The learned counsels for the parties are categorical in stating that there is an inadvertence in having these matters listed along with the other

1 W.P.No.35830/2025

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.