M/S Inpv Trading Company vs. Additional Director General
Held
The Court accepted the submission that the writ petitions concerning GST disputes had already been disposed of by a separate order on December 17, 2025, and therefore, no further orders were required in those specific matters. For W.P.No.35830/2025, the Court noted that the Revenue had filed an appeal against the common order, and the Division Bench had restored the writ appeal for reconsideration on merits. In light of this, the Court de-tagged W.P.No.35830/2025 and directed the office to re-list it for preliminary hearing on August 11, 2026. The ratio appears to be that matters already disposed of by specific orders do not require further adjudication unless specifically directed, and matters where appeals have been filed and restored for reconsideration on merits should be re-listed for that purpose.
Facts
The petitioners, including M/s. Edge Solutions, filed writ petitions challenging orders related to GST. These matters were initially listed along with other cases. However, it was brought to the Court's attention that the dispute specifically pertained to GST and had been disposed of by a separate order on December 17, 2025. For W.P.No.35830/2025, it was noted that the Revenue had filed an appeal (W.A.No.1089/2026) against the common order. The Division Bench, in its order dated April 24, 2026, restored the writ appeal for reconsideration on merits. Consequently, the writ petition was de-tagged for separate adjudication.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ petitions concerning GST disputes, which were disposed of by a separate order on December 17, 2025, require further consideration in the current proceedings? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioners, through their counsel, submitted that the matters were inadvertently listed with other cases and that the dispute relates to GST, having been disposed of by a separate order on December 17, 2025. They argued that no further orders are required in these specific petitions. Revenue's Contention: For W.P.No.35830/2025, the Revenue had filed an appeal (W.A.No.1089/2026) against the common order. The Division Bench, in its order dated April 24, 2026, restored the writ appeal for reconsideration on merits, implying that the original writ petition needed to be re-examined.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (27 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER The petitions were listed for a common decision and separate daily common orders are passed specific to certain petitions, including these petitions. The order relevant to these petitions read as under. "IN W.P.No.22647/2022 and 26 Connected Matters1
The learned counsels for the parties are categorical in stating that there is an inadvertence in having these matters listed along with the other
1 W.P.No.35830/2025
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.