M/S Sharada Enterprises vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Held
The High Court set aside the adjudication and appellate orders, remitting the matter back to the original authority. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to submit their reply to the show-cause notice.
Facts
The petitioner failed to submit a reply to a show-cause notice issued under Section 73 of the CGST/KGST Act. Consequently, an adjudication order was passed, which was later upheld by the appellate authority. The petitioner then approached the High Court, claiming bonafide reasons for their inability to respond.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner was afforded adequate opportunity to contest the proceedings and if bonafide reasons exist for non-compliance.
Sections Cited
Section 73, Section 73 (9), Section 107(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
DATED 30.12.2023 PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE NO. CTO/GSTSO-222/TKE/SEC-73/T-3189/23-24, AND THE DRC-07 BEARING REF NO. ZD291223101657H, ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT IS HEREWITH EN
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.