The Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
This writ appeal by the Revenue under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, is directed against the learned Single Judge’s order dated 17.12.2025 in W.P.No.23902/2025 where under the respondent’s writ petition is allowed quashing the common show cause notice issued under Sections 74 of the CGST/KGST Act, 2017 dated 01.08.2024 and Order-in-Original dated 23.12.2024. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23111-DB
This Court by order dated 24.04.2026 in W.A.No.1751/2024 and Connected Appeals, allowed the Writ Appeals and restored the show cause notice and Orders in Original. The decision rendered therein would aptly apply to the present appeal also. Since the Order-in- Original is passed in pursuance to the show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Act and since the Order-in- Original dated 23.12.2024 is passed ex-parte, we deem it appropriate to provide the Respondent with an opportunity to reply to the show cause notice dated 01.08.2024. Consequently, the show cause notice is restored. We deem it appropriate, while relegating the respondent to the stage of reply to show cause notice, to grant 4 weeks' time to file their reply. If such reply is filed within the time granted hereinabove, the proper officer shall consider the same on merits.
Hence, the following: ORDER (i) Writ appeal is allowed. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23111-DB (ii) The order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 17.12.2025 in W.P.No.23902/2025 is set aside.
(iii) Order-in-Original dated 23.12.2024 is set aside and show cause notice dated 01.08.2024 stands restored.
(iv) The respondent is provided four weeks time from the day this judgment is uploaded on the website of this Court to file their reply to the show cause notice.
(v) If the reply is filed within 4 weeks, then the proper officer shall consider the same on merits. (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 2 Sl No.: 41
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.