M/S Pericorp vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP Smt.Jyothi M. Maradi accepts notice for the respondents. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 22.12.2025 passed under Section 73 (9) of the KGST Act, 2017. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23395
It is the case of the petitioner that the order passed is an exparte order and petitioner could not make out reply to the show-cause notice and the order has culminated into order of adjudication without benefit to the stand of the petitioner.
Petitioner submits that during the pendency of adjudication proceedings, the petitioner has made out a communication dated 24.05.2024 setting out certain revised turn over.
It is further submitted that subsequently the petitioner realized that the communication of 24.05.2024 would not make much of difference and he has material to demonstrate the same.
It is further submitted that the authorities have relied on the communication of the petitioner dated 24.05.2024 and completed adjudication.
Perused the order of adjudication. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23395
The authorities appear to have concluded the proceedings taking note of the communication of the petitioner.
In light of the stand of the petitioner, the matter is required to be remitted for fresh consideration. The petitioner would explain the circumstances of the communication dated 24.05.2024 and also demonstrate other material which would lead to reconsideration of the matter.
Taking note of the same and assertion of the petitioner and noticing that the order of adjudication rests on factual matrix that requires clarification at the petitioner's end, in light of the findings and discrepancies as noticed by the parties, it would be appropriate to set aside the order of adjudication at Annexure-B and remit the matter for fresh adjudication to the stage of reply to the show-cause notice. Petitioner is directed to pay cost of Rs.10,000/- to the Advocate Clerks Benevolent Fund. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23395 Petitioner to appear without further notice before the respondent no.2 on 25.05.2026. All contentions are kept open.
Accordingly the petition is disposed of. (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.