M/S. Attica Gold Private Limited vs. The Director General Of Goods And Services Tax
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner challenged a provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017. The High Court raised an objection regarding its territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition.
Held
The Court accepted the petitioner's memo to withdraw the petition due to the objection on territorial jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue remedies before an appropriate forum.
Key Issues
The key legal issue addressed by the Court was the maintainability of the petition based on territorial jurisdiction. The petition itself challenged the legality of a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act.
Sections Cited
Section 83
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
The petition is listed for orders on maintainability with the office objections being on the territorial juri iction of this Bench.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under: “The undersigned counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submits that the petitioner seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the above petition, in view of the objection raised by the Registry/The office is directed to re-list this petition on regarding the maintainability of the petition on the ground of territorial juri iction.
The petitioner, therefore, prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit withdrawal of the present petition, with liberty to pursue such remedies as may be available in law before the appropriate forum, and without prejudice to the rights, contentions, and grounds urged in the petition, in the interest of justice and equity. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27899 WP No. 17115 of 2026
It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.”
The memo is accepted, and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for, subject to all just exceptions. (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
AN/-
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.