M/S Hardik Gowda vs. The Additional Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (Enf)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner's grievance is with the Intimations and the Show Cause Notices in Form GST DRC-01 and GST DRC-01A [which are produced respectively as Annexures-A, B, C, D, E and F series]. These impugned Intimations and Show Cause Notices are for the years 2020-21 to 2024-25. The details of the impugned Intimations/Show Cause Notices for the corresponding periods are as follows: HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35169 The Show Cause Notice bearing No. ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT-25/INS- 80/23-24 dated 25.03.2026 along with Form GST DRC – 01 dated 25.03.2026 for the financial year 2020 – 21
Annexure-A The Show Cause Notice bearing No.ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT-25/INS- 80/23-24 dated 25.03.2026 along with Form GST DRC – 01 dated 25.03.2026 for the financial year 2021 – 22. Annexure-B The Show Cause Notice bearing No.ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT-25/INS- 80/23-24 dated 25.03.2026 along with Form GST DRC – 01 dated 25.03.2026 for the financial year 2022-23. Annexure-C The Show Cause Notice bearing No.ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT-25/INS- 80/23-24 dated 25.03.2026 along with Form GST DRC – 01 dated 25.03.2026 for the financial year 2023-24. Annexure-D The Show Cause Notice bearing No.ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT-25/INS- 80/23-24 dated 25.03.2026 along with Form GST DRC – 01 dated 25.03.2026 for the financial year 2024 – 25. Annexure-E The impugned Form GST DRC -01A dated 18.03.2026 Annexure-F The impugned Form GST DRC -01A Part A dated 18.03.2026 for the financial year 2020-21
Annexure-F1 HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35169 The impugned Form GST DRC -01A Part A dated 18.03.2026 for the financial year 2021-22
Annexure-F2 The impugned Form GST DRC -01A Part A dated 18.03.2026 for the financial year 2022-23
Annexure-F3 The impugned Form GST DRC -01A Part A dated 18.03.2026 for the financial year 2023-24
Annexure-F4 The impugned Form GST DRC -01A Part A dated 18.03.2026 for the financial year 2024-25
Annexure-F5
Sri Dalwai Venaktesh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this Court must interfere with the impugned Intimations and Show Cause Notices for the following reasons.
[a] The Intimations and the Show Cause Notices relevant to the financial period 2020-21 to 2024-25 are for the propositions which have been examined in the statutory proceedings under Section 61 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short, ‘the Act’] with a finding that the explanation HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35169 offered by the petitioner must be accepted and there would be no occasion for an assessment otherwise. [b] The petitioner is issued with Intimation in GST-DRC-01A for the year 2024-25 as for the three other previous years on 18.03.2026 and petitioner has filed reply on 25.03.2026, but the impugned Show Cause Notices have been issued on the same day without examining any of the responses. The learned counsel also proposes to elaborate on why the proceedings could be initiated even otherwise on merits, but these two are the fundamental grievances offered as the threshold barriers for the conclusions.
Sri Hema Kumar K., the learned Additional Government Advocate who accepts notice for the respondents, is heard for the disposal of the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits: HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35169 [i] that the scrutiny proceedings would be independent of an inspection which could lead to, as in this case, Notice under Section 74 of the Act, and [ii] that the authorities on inspection and finding material have issued Show Cause Notices after Intimation.
On the Show Cause Notices being on the very same day [as the date of reply to the intimation], the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that even now the petitioner would have the opportunity to show cause against continuing proceedings even if the petitioner would assert that there is no occasion for invoking the provisions of Section 74 of the Act.
The rival submissions are considered examining whether this Court must truncate the proceedings at the show-cause stage itself. This Court, given the two circumstances put forth and the opportunity that undeniably will be with the petitioner HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35169 being asked to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice and also ask for a personal hearing, is of the view that the petition must be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file response to the Show Cause Notices.
This Court must next observe that all grounds urged must be open to be examined for an effective conclusion and that the Adjudicating Authority must be called upon to examine in detail all circumstances including the grounds offered as against the very initiation of the proceedings. When queried, Sri K. Hema Kumar submits that his instructions are that though time provided for response has expired, the proceedings are not concluded. In the light of the afore, the following: ORDER
The petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to appear before the Adjudicating Authority [the second respondent] on 21.09.2026 and also be at HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35169 liberty to file response to the Show Cause Notices. The Court reiterates that if the petitioner files the responses with the documents and makes a request for a personal hearing, the second respondent shall extend such opportunity and conclude the proceedings by a reasoned order considering all grounds thereof. (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
SA Ct:sr
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.