M/S Sri Vinayaka Electricals vs. Commercial Tax Officer

WP/14145/2026HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01031391202629 August 2026Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD12 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. JOSEPH VARGHESE, ADVOCATE
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The High Court found the simultaneous proceedings under Section 73 and Section 74 incongruous. It quashed the show cause notice and adjudication order under Section 74 entirely. For the Section 73 proceedings, it quashed the adjudication order and garnishee notice, restoring the matter for reconsideration to allow the petitioner to present documents justifying its exemption claim.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Sri Vinayaka Electricals, challenged two sets of proceedings under the KGST/CGST Act: one under Section 73 for erroneous declaration of turnover as 'Nil'/Exempted, and another under Section 74 for GSTR-3B and GSTR-7 mismatches. Both proceedings culminated in ex-parte adjudication orders and a garnishee notice, as the petitioner failed to respond, despite claiming exemption under Notification No.12/2017.

Key Issues

Whether two simultaneous proceedings under Section 73 and Section 74 of the KGST/CGST Act can be sustained, and if ex-parte adjudication orders should be set aside to allow the petitioner to present its case for exemption.

Sections Cited

Section 73, Section 73(9), Section 74, Section 74(9), Section 79(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

WP No. 14145 of 2026
WP No. 23152 of 2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

- 1 -

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010313912026 NC: 2026:KHC:46880 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKAAT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29THDAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14145 OF 2026 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 23152 OF 2026

W.P. NO. 14145 / 2026

BETWEEN:

M/S SRI VINAYAKA ELECTRICALS A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP, HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT NO. 109. WARD 17. KOARACHARA COLONY, KR EXTENSION, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU. KARNATAKA-572 132,

REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAPPA, RESIDING AT NO. 16, 2ND MAIN ROAD, KUNIGAL ROAD, BANASHANKARI, TUMAKURU, KARNATAKA-572 102 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JOSEPH VARGHESE ,ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER ENFORCEMENT SOUTH ZONE-31 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT B-BLOCK, ROOM NO. 605, VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010313912026 NC: 2026:KHC:46880 6TH FLOOR, VTK BUILDING, RAJENDRANAGARA, KORAMANGALA BENG

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.