M/S Torrent Pharmaceuticals LTD. (Unit Iii) (Erstwhile Unichem Laboratories LTD.) vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.

WP(C)/55/2023HC SikkimGSTCNR SKHC01000167202302 April 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN7 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court noted that the Single Bench judgments relied upon by the Assistant Commissioner, which denied BSS benefits due to change in ownership, had been set aside by a Division Bench. Finding the present case squarely covered by the Division Bench's binding decision, which held that units with a change of ownership are entitled to BSS benefits, the High Court allowed the writ petition.

Facts

M/s Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. acquired a unit via slump sale and was subsequently sanctioned refunds totaling Rs. 12,18,27,592/- under the Budgetary Support Scheme (BSS). A recovery notice was later issued, and an order-in-original confirmed the demand for refund recovery, asserting that a change in ownership rendered the unit ineligible for BSS benefits based on a DPIIT clarification.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was whether a manufacturing unit, after undergoing a change in ownership through a slump sale, remains eligible for benefits under the Budgetary Support Scheme, especially considering a DPIIT clarification suggesting ineligibility.

Sections Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of India, paragraph 9 of the Budgetary Support Scheme, paragraph 9.1 of the Budgetary Support Scheme

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM: GANGTOK (Civil Extra Ordinary Jurisdiction) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SINGLE BENCH: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

W.P. (C) No. 55 of 2023

M/s Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Unit-III), (Erstwhile Unichem Laboratories Ltd.), Represented by Assistant Manager Finance, Sanjay Singh, N.H. No.10, Bagheykhola, Majhitar, East Sikkim, 737136. ….. Petitioner

Versus

1.

Union of India,

Through Secretary,

Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance,

North Block, New Delhi-110001. 2. Commissioner of CGST, Siliguri,

Gangtok Division,

C.R. Building, Haren Mukherjee Road,

Hakimpara, Siliguri,

West Bengal-734001. 3. Under Secretary, Department for Promotion

of Industry and Internal Trade,

(DPIIT), Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi-110001. 4. Assistant Commissioner, CGST,

Gangtok Division, Indira Byepass,

Near District Court,

Sichey, Gangtok, East Sikkim-7371001. ….. Respondents

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Sikkim High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.