Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Aurangabad vs. M/S Wipro LTD.

CA/10084/2018HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM03028783201806 August 2018Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. GAVHANE2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the applicant-appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. This decision was based on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the reasons stated in the application for withdrawal, and the instructions dated July 11, 2018, which indicated that appeals involving tax liability below Rs. 50 Lakhs could be withdrawn. The Court found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.

Facts

The applicant-appellant, Commissioner GST & Central Excise, Aurangabad, filed an application to withdraw First Appeal No. 648 of 2006. The appeal was filed against M/s Wipro Ltd. (Lighting Division), Aurangabad. The learned counsel for the applicant-appellant informed the Court that the tax liability involved in the matter is below Rs. 50 Lakhs, citing instructions dated July 11, 2018, as the basis for seeking withdrawal. The application was supported by the reasons stated therein and the aforementioned instructions.

Key Issues

1. Whether the applicant-appellant should be permitted to withdraw the appeal, considering the tax liability is below Rs. 50 Lakhs and in light of the instructions dated July 11, 2018? The applicant-appellant argued that the tax liability in the matter is below Rs. 50 Lakhs and, in accordance with the instructions dated July 11, 2018, sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The revenue or State did not record any specific arguments in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ca10084.18 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10084 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.648 OF 2006 Commissioner GST & Central Excise, Aurangabad ..APPLICANT VERSUS M/s Wipro Ltd. (Lighting Division), Aurangabad ..RESPONDENT Mrs (Dr.) Kalpalata Patil - Bharaswadkar , Advocate for applicant CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 6th August, 2018

ORAL ORDER: By the present application the applicant-appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal. Our attention is invited to the instructions dated 11th July, 2018. In view of these instructions, learned Counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that the tax liability involved in the matter is below Rs.50 Lakhs. As such, the applicant prays for withdrawal of the appeal.

2.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the applicant and in view of the reasons stated in the application as well as the ca10084.18 (2) instructions dat

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.