Divya Singla And Others vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Held
The Court held that the prayer made in the petition had been rendered infructuous. This decision was based on the submission made by the learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3. The counsel stated that the 26th meeting of the GST Council, held on 10.03.2018, had decided that no GST or Service Tax is leviable on the fee paid for the grant of a license for the sale of liquor for human consumption. Consequently, the notice dated 15.05.2017, which sought information pertaining to the levy of service tax on such fees, was rendered obsolete. The Court did not delve into the legal merits of the service tax levy itself, as the subsequent development made the petition unnecessary. The operative direction was to dispose of the petition as infructuous.
Facts
The petitioners, Divya Singla and others, approached the High Court of Punjab and Haryana seeking to quash a notice dated 15.05.2017. This notice, issued by the respondents, required the petitioners to furnish information concerning the levy of service tax on fees paid for the award of a license for the sale of liquor. The petitioners challenged this demand for information related to service tax on liquor license fees.
Key Issues
1. Whether the notice dated 15.05.2017, demanding information regarding the levy of service tax on the fee paid for the award of a license for the sale of liquor, is legally sustainable? Petitioner's contention: The petitioners sought to quash the notice, implying it was not legally sustainable. Revenue/State's contention: The respondents, through their counsel, submitted that based on a decision in the 26th meeting of the GST Council held on 10.03.2018, it was decided that no GST or Service Tax is leviable on the fee paid for the grant of a license for the sale of liquor for human consumption. This statement effectively conceded that the demand for information was no longer valid.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
211
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 27.08.2018 Divya Singla and others
...... Petitioners Versus Union of India and others
....... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 3. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. The petitioners approached this Court seeking quashing of notice dated 15.05.2017 whereby the respondent asked the petitioner to furnish certain information with reference to levy of service tax on the fee paid for award of license for sale of liquor. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 fairly submitted that he has received instructions to the State that in 26th meeting of GST Council held on 10.03.2018 it has been decided that no GST/Service Tax is leviable on the fee paid for grant of license sale of liquor for human consumption. Rittu 2018.08.29 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- Keeping in view the statement made b
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.