Biju K Daniel vs. Rajesh
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT When the matter came up for hearing, it is submitted before this court that, a memo filed by the petitioner showing that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above original petition. Notice to the respondent not so far ordered. Under such circumstances, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh as and when required. K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH ss JUDGE
OP(C)No.2388 of 2018 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE PLAINT IN OS.NO.32/2018 OF MUNSIFF'S SUB KOTTARAKKARA. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE IA.NO.628 OF 2018 IN OS.32/2018 OF SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER IN IA.NO.628 KOTTARAKKARA DATED 17.9.2018. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER IN IA.NO.628 KOTTARAKKARA DATED 18.9.2018. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LICENCE NO.A5- 4799/2018-19-77 OF THE 2ND PETITIONER ISSUED BY SECRETARY MYLOM GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 13.6.2018. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE GST REGN.CERTIFICATE NO.32AJRPD4119K1Z8 OF THE 2ND DATED 21.9.2017. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SCHEDULE OF PROPERTIES IN OS.NO.32/2018 OF SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.