Ritika Enterprises vs. State Of Punjab And Another
Held
The Court noted the submission made by the learned counsel for the State that the order cancelling the petitioner's GSTIN dated 07.03.2018 has been revoked by an order dated 17.10.2018. The State further assured the Court that this revocation order would be uploaded on the GST Network within a period of two weeks. In light of this submission and assurance from the State, the High Court disposed of the present petition. The Court did not delve into the merits of the cancellation order itself, as the issue was rendered infructuous by the subsequent revocation. No specific reasoning beyond the State's submission was provided. The operative direction was to dispose of the petition.
Facts
The petitioner, Ritika Enterprises, approached the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh seeking to quash an order dated 07.03.2018, which had cancelled its GSTIN (03DYEPK2353B1Z1). The order was passed by the State authorities. The petitioner sought relief from the High Court. The tax period for which the GSTIN was cancelled is not explicitly stated in the judgment. The amount in dispute is not mentioned. The procedural history leading to the cancellation is not detailed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's GSTIN vide order dated 07.03.2018 is liable to be quashed? (Question of law). The petitioner argued that the cancellation order was illegal and sought its quashing. The State, through its counsel, submitted that the order of cancellation has since been revoked. The State further stated that the revocation order dated 17.10.2018 would be uploaded on the GST Network within two weeks. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were explicitly argued by either side, nor were any precedents or circulars cited in the provided text.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
250 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25516-2018 Date of decision: 22.10.2018 Ritika Enterprises .... Petitioner versus State of Punjab & anr. .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: Mr. Aman Garg, Advocate for Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** Rajesh Bindal, J The petitioner approached this Court seeking quashing the order dated 07.03.2018 (Annexure P-3) vide which the GSTIN 03DYEPK2353B1Z1 of the petitioner was cancelled. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the order has been revoked vide order dated 17.10.2018 and the same shall be uploaded on the GST Network within a period of two weeks. In view of the stand taken by learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
2018 (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No SONIA BURA 2018.10.26 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.