A Syed Ali Fathima vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner's goods have been detained. She is ready to take release of the goods on execution of Bank Guarantee. However, she submits that since dispute is regarding the misclassification, photographs shall be taken before the release of the goods. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: (i) Photographs and negatives shall be taken with regard to the nature of the goods. (ii) Goods shall be released on furnishing Bank Guarantee, applicable to the petitioner. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE INVOICE NO.181 DATED 30.10.2018 ACCOMPANIED WITH THE CONSIGNMENT. EXHIBIT P2OF THE FORM GST MOV-02 ORDER NO. NIL DATED NIL ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR PHYSICAL VERIFICATION. EXHIBIT P3OF THE FORM GST MOV-04 PHYSICAL VERIFICATION REPORT DATED 01.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
WP(C) No.36047/2018 3 EXHIBIT P4OF THE FORM GST MOV-06 ORDER NO. NIL DATED NIL ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DETAINING THE GOODS AND THE VEHICLE. EXHIBIT P5OF THE FORM GST MOV-07 SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO. NIL DATED NIL ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P6OF THE WRITTEN OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST EXHIBIT P4 & P5 DATED 02.11.2018. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: NIL \\// PS TO JUDGE skk
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.