M/S. Plyneer Industries vs. Asst. State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner's counsel represents that as the matter relates to detention under Section 129, the petitioner wants to file an appeal. So it wants to withdraw this writ petition. Accordingly, I dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE das APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF BILL OF ENTRY NO.5279950 ISSUED BY THE TOANQUOC ECOLOGY TRAVEL CO.LTD., VIETNAM. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF NOTICE UNDER SECTION 129(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 A COPY OF NOTICE UNDER SECTION 129 (1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 B COPY OF NOTICE UNDER SECTION 129(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
-3- W.P.(C). No. 28512 of 2018 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF INVOICE NO.GST/1753 ISSUED BY UNIQUE PLY AND BOARDS, PERUMBAVOOR. EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF DRAFT NOS.000098, 000096 AND 000097 OF AXIS BANK LTD., KALADY BRANCH. EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P8 COPY OF LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.