M/S.Southern Surface Finishers vs. The State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in the business of powder coating of aluminum and lamination work. According to the petitioner, necessary clearances from the respective statutory authorities and consent from the Pollution Control Board were secured and the petitioner is complying with whatever conditions imposed in the consent and clearances issued by the respective statutory authorities. However, seeking modifications in the conditions of consent issued by the Pollution Control Board, petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 before the 2nd respondent, which is pending consideration. The sole relief sought for is early consideration of Ext.P5. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader, and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to finalise the proceedings pertaining to WP(C).No. 26347 of 2018 3 Ext.P5 at the earliest and at any rate within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE
WP(C).No. 26347 of 2018 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LICENSE ISSUED FORM THE KUNNATHUNAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT EXT.P2 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PROVISIONAL REGISTRATION UNDER THE GST IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER'S FIRM EXT.P3 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE CONSENT ISSUED FROM THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD EXT.P4 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN SURFACE FINISHERS AND THE KERELA ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD (KEIL) EXT.P5 AOF THE SUBMISSION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT //// JS 13.11.2018 PA TO JUDGE
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.