M/S.Square Deal vs. State Of Kerala
Held
The Court held that proceedings initiated before the GST regime could be continued due to transitional provisions. However, the order passed was appealable under the KVAT Act.
Facts
Goods of the petitioner were detained and subjected to penalty in 2013 under the KVAT Act. Later, a notice was issued under Section 47(6) of the KVAT Act in 2017, leading to an order. The petitioner argued that the KVAT Act ceased to exist before the notice was issued.
Key Issues
Whether proceedings initiated under the KVAT Act could be continued after the introduction of GST, and if the order passed was amenable to appeal.
Sections Cited
Section 47(6), Section 55
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, an assessee under the KVAT Act, had its goods detained and subjected to penalty. The petitioner then provided the security and had the goods released. It all happened in 2013. Later, the revenue issued a notice under Section 47(6) on 21.10.2017 to which the petitioner submitted its reply dated 04.11.2017. That resulted in the Ext.P5 order.
Now the petitioner asserts that the Ext.P5 order is ultra
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.