Abt Parcel Service vs. The Asst. State Tax Officer
Held
The Court directed the release of the goods and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty due, and a bond for the value of the goods as prescribed under the rules. This was based on a previous High Court judgment on a similar issue.
Facts
The petitioner, a goods transporting agency, had its vehicle and goods detained by the Assistant State Tax Officer for failing to upload the Part-B of the e-way bill. The petitioner sought to quash the detention order and release the goods without security.
Key Issues
Whether goods and vehicle detained for non-upload of Part-B of e-way bill can be released upon furnishing security and bond, following precedent.
Sections Cited
Section 129, Rule 140(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner is a a goods transporting agency and an assessee under the CGST Act. While it was transporting goods from Tirunelveli to Kerala, the Assistant State Tax Officer detained the vehicle and the goods. The detention is because the petitioner did not upload the Part-B e-way bill.
In the writ petition, the petitioner sought the following reliefs: “(i) Issue a writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.