M.Abdul Rasheed vs. The Asst.Commissioner Of State Tax
Held
The Court directed the respondent authorities to defer coercive steps until the appellate authority decides on the stay petitions. The Court also expressed hope for expeditious disposal of the stay petitions.
Facts
The petitioner filed appeals and stay petitions before the appellate authority against assessment orders. The petitioner approached the High Court alleging coercive steps were being taken before the stay petitions were decided.
Key Issues
Whether coercive steps can be taken against a dealer before the appellate authority decides on pending stay petitions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, ('CST Act') on the rolls of the 1st respondent, questioned the Ext.P1 series of assessment orders, before the 2nd respondent.
The petitioner has also filed stay petitions in the appeals.
Ventilating his grievance that the authorities are taking coercive steps before the appellate authority could consider the stay petitions, the petitioner has filed this
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.