M/S.Indsil Hydro Power And Manganese LTD vs. The Asst. Commissioner
Held
The Court directed the respondent to permit the petitioner to revise their returns. This decision was based on a prior judgment of the same High Court which covered the issues in favor of the petitioner.
Facts
The petitioner sought to revise their GST returns for the years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18. They had filed an application before the respondent authorities for this purpose.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner should be allowed to revise their GST returns for the specified years. The issue was resolved based on precedent.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner in the writ petition seeks the following relief; “i)
To direct the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner to revise the returns for the years 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 as prayed for in Exts.P3 forthwith by the issue of a writ of mandamus or such other writ or order or direction.”
Both the counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered in the petitioner's favour by a judg
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.