N.Sanal Kumar vs. The District Collector

WP(MD)/19393/2017HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01062218201701 November 2017Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the authorities concerned should consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.09.2017 and pass orders on merits in accordance with law. The reasoning was based on the agreement of the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents to grant the relief as requested by the petitioner's counsel. The operative direction was to consider the representation within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No specific issue regarding the legality of transporting M. Sand or the requirement of Form-F was decided on merits, as the petitioner restricted his prayer to consideration of his representation.

Facts

The petitioner, N. Sanal Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a Mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari, and subordinates to permit the transportation of M. Sand and crusher items from Kanyakumari to Trivandrum upon production of a transit pass in Form-F. The petitioner's counsel later restricted the prayer to a direction for the authorities to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.09.2017 and pass orders within a stipulated time. The respondents, through the Additional Government Pleader, agreed to this modified relief.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for the authorities to consider his representation dated 04.09.2017 regarding the transportation of M. Sand and crusher items. The petitioner argued that he is entitled to a positive direction to have his representation considered. The respondents, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, agreed that the requested relief could be granted.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.11.2017 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.(MD)No.19393 of 2017 N.Sanal Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Tax(GST), Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 4.The Assistant Director of Mines, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari and its subordinates to permit the petitioner for transporting the M.Sand and Crusher items on road form Kanyakumari to Trivandrum on production of transit pass in Form-F. For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Raja Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader

This writ petition filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent Superinten

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.