Commissioner Of Central Excise vs. Sumilon Industries LTD

TAXAP/114/2014HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24044693201426 December 2019Bench: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the appeal is to be disposed of as withdrawn, as prayed for by the appellant. This decision was based on the appellant's submission that the duty amount involved was below the revised monetary limit for preferring appeals before the High Court, as per CBIC Instructions F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019. The Court granted permission for withdrawal. However, it also provided a conditional liberty to the appellant to seek revival of the appeal if there was any error in the computation of the tax effect or if the aforementioned instruction was not applicable for any reason. No specific finding was made on the merits of the GST dispute itself.

Facts

This is a Tax Appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against Sumilon Industries Ltd. The appeal concerns a dispute related to Goods and Services Tax (GST). The appellant, through a communication dated 21st October 2019 from the Joint Commissioner, GST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Surat, informed the court that the duty amount involved in the appeal is below the revised monetary limit for preferring appeals before the High Court, as per CBIC Instructions F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019. Consequently, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal is maintainable before the High Court given that the duty amount involved is below the revised monetary limit prescribed by CBIC Instructions F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner (appellant) argued that the appeal should be withdrawn as the duty amount in dispute falls below the revised monetary limit for High Court appeals, as stipulated by the CBIC instructions. They relied on the communication from the Joint Commissioner, GST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Surat, to support this contention. Revenue/State's Argument: No argument was recorded for the revenue or State in this specific instance, as the appellant themselves sought withdrawal based on the revised monetary limits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/TAXAP/114/2014 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 114 of 2014 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus SUMILON INDUSTRIES LTD ========================================================== Appearance: MR. PARTH H BHATT(6381) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR PARESH M DAVE(260) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 26/12/2019

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1.

The learned counsel for the appellant has placed on record a communication dated 21st October 2019 of the Joint Commissioner, GST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Surat informing the learned senior standing counsel to withdraw the captioned tax appeal as the duty amount involved in the appeal is below the revised monetary limit for preferring appeals before the High Court in terms of the CBIS Instructions F.No.390/Misc/116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019. 2. The learned senior stan

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.