M/S Sindhi Traders vs. The Commissioner State Tax

WPMB/752/2026HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01016170202615 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court ruled that fixing a personal hearing prior to the date for submitting a reply to the show cause notice violated principles of natural justice. Consequently, both the assessment order and the appellate order were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh proceedings from the show cause notice stage.

Facts

The petitioner challenged a GST assessment order under Section 73 and a subsequent appellate order, arguing that the show cause notice procedure violated natural justice. The personal hearing was scheduled before the deadline for submitting a reply, and the notice was only uploaded on the GST portal.

Key Issues

Whether scheduling a personal hearing before the due date for submitting a reply to a show cause notice constitutes a violation of natural justice, and if so, what is the effect on the subsequent assessment and appellate orders.

Sections Cited

Section 73, Section 74, Section 75

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
UKHC010161702026 2026:UHC:8266-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 752 OF 2026 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2026 M/s Sindhi Traders …… Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, State Tax & others …… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Tarun Pande and Mr. Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel Counsel for the respondents : Ms. Puja Banga, learned Standing Counsel for the State through video conferencing The Court made the following:

JUDGMENT: (per Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

1)

Heard Mr. Tarun Pande and Mr. Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner-firm, and Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the respondents-State. 2)

The petitioner-firm has assailed the order dated 03.08.2024 passed by respondent no. 3, under Section 73 of the C.G.S.T Act / UKGST Act, demanding tax of Rs. 1

UKHC010161702026

2026:UHC:8266-DB 10,68,390.44, along with interest of Rs. 9,47,634/- and penalty of Rs. 1,06,

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.