M/S.Indus Motor Company Private LTD. vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State GST

WP(C)/2429/2019HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01006449201914 October 2022Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Indus Motor Company Private Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of Tax Collected at Source (TCS) amounts, collected under the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the taxable value for the purpose of GST on the sale of motor vehicles. The petitioner contended that TCS should not be part of the taxable value for GST. The respondent authorities are the Assistant Commissioner of State GST, Union of India, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The tax period is not explicitly stated but pertains to the sale of motor vehicles.

Held

The Court held that the issue raised in the writ petition no longer requires adjudication. This is because the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) issued Circular No. 76/50/2018-GST, clarified by a corrigendum dated 07.03.2019, which addresses the valuation methodology for GST on TCS. The circular clarifies that TCS collected under the Income Tax Act, 1961, will not be includible in the taxable value for GST determination on the sale of motor vehicles. The reasoning is that TCS is an interim levy and does not possess the character of a tax. Therefore, the writ petition is closed, with the understanding that the issue is governed by the aforementioned circular.

Key Issues

1. Whether amounts of TCS collected under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can form part of the taxable value of supply under the GST regime during the sale of motor vehicles, as per Section 15(2) of the CGST Act? The petitioner argued that TCS collected under the Income Tax Act should not be included in the taxable value for GST purposes. The revenue or State's contention is not explicitly recorded in terms of argument, but the judgment notes that the issue has been clarified by a circular.

Sections Cited

Section 15(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 22ND ASWINA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 2429 OF 2019 PETITIONER/S: M/S.INDUS MOTOR COMPANY PRIVATE LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE, M.G.ROAD, THEVARA, KOCHI-682 016, REPRESENTED BY ANAS K.P.G.M.FINANCE AND AUDIT. BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SMT.K.KRISHNA RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE GST TAX TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682 015. 2 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3 CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS, GST POLICY WING, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110001, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER (GST). 4 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018 BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX SRI. C.S MANU, DSGI SRI. SREELAL WARRIER, SC SMT.DR. THUSHARA JAMES - R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 2429 OF 2019 2 JUDGMENT This writ petition raises the question as to whether the amounts of TCS c

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.